IS-IS
IS-IS. The RFCs whose summary names the isis aggregate, with their mandatory and optional coverage.
MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL and SHALL NOT rows of the walked RFCs that a recorded test break proves.
MAY, NOT RECOMMENDED, OPTIONAL, RECOMMENDED, SHOULD and SHOULD NOT rows, counted the same way.
Attainable mandatory rows under current classifications, over the unchanged total.
Attainable optional rows under current classifications, over the unchanged total.
RFCs with no valid extraction sign-off: their rows count in neither figure.
A profile is complete only when it requires at least one RFC and none of them is unwalked.
Mandatory ceiling: 102 of 125 (81.6%); excluded: Not applicable (classification can be revisited): 23 of 125 (18.4%). Optional ceiling: 36 of 36 (100.0%). Lowest mandatory ceiling: rfc3786 2 of 9 (22.2%). Lowest optional ceiling: rfc1195 1 of 1 (100.0%). Ceilings describe current classifications, not an immutable Linux maximum. Not-applicable and feature-declined classifications can be revisited. Every gap remains work Ze owes.
Tree
Roots first: an RFC sits one level above the highest level of the RFCs it builds on, and the RFCs of one citation cycle share a level. Each bar is the share of that figure's rows a recorded break proves; the ceiling below it shows attainable rows under current classifications. An RFC that is not walked shows an empty bar and no figure or ceiling.
Level 0
| RFC | Title | Mandatory | Optional |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFC 5301 | Dynamic Hostname Exchange Mechanism for IS-IS | Ceiling: 7 of 7 (100.0%) | Ceiling: 8 of 8 (100.0%) |
| RFC 5304 | IS-IS Cryptographic Authentication | Ceiling: 8 of 9 (88.9%); excluded: Not applicable (classification can be revisited): 1 of 9 (11.1%) | Ceiling: 5 of 5 (100.0%) |
| RFC 5305 | IS-IS Extensions for Traffic Engineering | Ceiling: 9 of 14 (64.3%); excluded: Not applicable (classification can be revisited): 5 of 14 (35.7%) | Ceiling: 8 of 8 (100.0%) |
Level 2
| RFC | Title | Mandatory | Optional |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFC 1195 (cycle with rfc1034, rfc1035, rfc1122, rfc1191, rfc1332, rfc1812, rfc2131, rfc2132, rfc4291, rfc4443, rfc4861, rfc5905, rfc8200, rfc8201, rfc9293) | Use of OSI IS-IS for Routing in TCP/IP and Dual Environments | Ceiling: 34 of 41 (82.9%); excluded: Not applicable (classification can be revisited): 7 of 41 (17.1%) | Ceiling: 1 of 1 (100.0%) |
Level 3
| RFC | Title | Mandatory | Optional |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFC 2966 | Domain-wide Prefix Distribution with Two-Level IS-IS | Ceiling: 6 of 6 (100.0%) | Ceiling: 2 of 2 (100.0%) |
| RFC 3786 | Extending the Number of Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Link State PDU (LSP) Fragments Beyond the 256 Limit | Ceiling: 2 of 9 (22.2%); excluded: Not applicable (classification can be revisited): 7 of 9 (77.8%) | Ceiling: 4 of 4 (100.0%) |
| RFC 3787 | Recommendations for Interoperable IP Networks using Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) | Ceiling: 5 of 5 (100.0%) | Ceiling: 3 of 3 (100.0%) |
| RFC 5303 | Three-Way Handshake for IS-IS Point-to-Point Adjacencies | Ceiling: 15 of 17 (88.2%); excluded: Not applicable (classification can be revisited): 2 of 17 (11.8%) | Ceiling: 1 of 1 (100.0%) |
| RFC 5308 | Routing IPv6 with IS-IS | Ceiling: 8 of 8 (100.0%) | Ceiling: 1 of 1 (100.0%) |
| RFC 5310 | IS-IS Generic Cryptographic Authentication | Ceiling: 8 of 9 (88.9%); excluded: Not applicable (classification can be revisited): 1 of 9 (11.1%) | Ceiling: 3 of 3 (100.0%) |
No level: the corpus holds no text of the RFC
| RFC | Title | Mandatory | Optional |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFC 5120 | M-ISIS: Multi Topology (MT) Routing in Intermediate System to Intermediate Systems (IS-ISs) |