Partial

RFC 6608 - Subcodes for BGP Finite State Machine Error

Every requirement this repository extracted from RFC 6608, the tests bound to it, and what a reader has verified about them. This summary is enrolled and gated by ./le rfc check.

Overview

Positive

what Ze has

Tested both ways0.0%0 of 3 binding obligations

a positive test proves Ze does what the requirement demands and a negative one proves it refuses what the requirement forbids

One polarity plus reason0.0%0 of 3 binding obligations

the requirement admits no counter-case, so one polarity plus a recorded reason is the whole proof available for it

One polarity, unexcused0.0%0 of 3 binding obligations

one direction is tested, the other is neither tested nor excused, and nothing states which

Proven by a recorded break0.0%0 of 0 tagged units

a red was observed once under a recorded procedure, and the unit, the claim and the producer it rested on still hash to what was recorded. The break is not re-run. A test pair is not a proof until one has been observed

Neutral

measures that are neither good news nor bad

Gated MUSTs3of 3 this summary declares

MUST-level requirements the gate HOLDS. A population, not a result: the shares beside it are what says how Ze stands

Out of scope0of 3 gated MUSTs

a {not-applicable} annotation says the obligation does not bind Ze. Scope, not coverage: it is in no share below

Negative

what Ze owes

No test at all100.0%3 of 3 binding obligations

no test carries the requirement id, whether or not a gap states why

The 4 shares marked as a part above are the whole of the 3 obligations that bind Ze: they add to 100%. Proven by a recorded break is a share of TAGGED UNITS, a different population, so it is not one of them.

How to read the colors

A color names what the measure MEANS, not how well Ze scores on it. Green is a good outcome at any value, red is a bad one, and neither a population nor a scope count is an outcome, so both take no color. The number under the label is what says how far Ze has got.

CardTone hereWhy that color
Gated MUSTs neutral no color: a population is a scale, and a larger one is neither good news nor bad. It is the accounting total
Out of scope neutral no color: an obligation that never bound Ze is neither an achievement nor a failure, and counting it either way would be a claim
Tested both ways ok green at every value: a test pair is the outcome this gate exists to produce, and the share under the label is what says how far Ze has got
One polarity plus reason ok green at every value: where no counter-case exists, one polarity IS the complete answer, and a recorded reason is what the gate demands beside it
One polarity, unexcused ok green at zero, RED above it: half a proof with no reason for the other half
No test at all bad green at zero, RED above it: a binding obligation nothing exercises is a claim with nothing behind it, whether or not a reason is stated
Proven by a recorded break ok green at every value: an observed break is the outcome the discrimination gate exists to produce. The denominator is TAGGED UNITS, not obligations, so this share is not one of the parts above
Audit verdicts warn RED on the first weak, wrong or unimplemented verdict, amber while a verdict is no longer current or a gated MUST is unjudged, green when every one is judged sound and current

At a glance

FieldValue
Public status Partial
Enrolment Enrolled
Requirements 3
Gated MUST-level 3
Obligations that bind Ze 3
Not applicable, so out of scope 0
Declared gaps 3
Gated with no test 0
Nightly-only evidence 0
Test tags 0
Tagged units 0
Recorded audit verdicts 0
Discrimination records 0
Summary rfc/short/rfc6608.md
Requirement shard rfc/requirements/rfc6608.md
RFC text rfc/full/rfc6608.txt

Enrolment

Enrolled: Subcodes for BGP Finite State Machine Error: three MUSTs requiring a code-5 FSM Error NOTIFICATION with subcode 1/2/3 (plus the 1-octet message type) on an unexpected message in OpenSent/OpenConfirm/Established. All three are {gap}: ze defines and decodes the subcodes (message/notification.go:110-113, format/decode.go:316-320) but never originates them -- the reactor dispatches received messages by type with no FSM-state guard (reactor/session_read.go:260-273) and no path emits these subcodes. Disclosed in the docs/features/rfc-status.md RFC 6608 row (Partial).

What the public ledger says

Status: Partial

What the ledger says is covered:

The RFC 6608 FSM Error subcodes (1 OpenSent, 2 OpenConfirm, 3 Established) are defined and decoded for display of a received NOTIFICATION.

What the ledger says remains:

Three MUST gaps, gated in rfc/short/rfc6608.md: ze does not originate a code-5 FSM Error NOTIFICATION with these subcodes on an unexpected message; the reactor dispatches received messages by type without an FSM-state guard.

Coverage

BucketCountWhat it counts
Positive and negative tests 0 one part of the gated population
Annotated instead of tested 3 one part of the gated population
One polarity only 0 one part of the gated population
No test and no annotation 0 one part of the gated population
Evidence that runs nightly only 0 an overlay: each of these is also counted by the part it falls in
Gated MUST-level requirements3every gated MUST falls in exactly one bucket above

Annotated instead of tested (3): RFC6608-4-1, RFC6608-4-2, RFC6608-4-3

Requirements

RequirementLevelSectionTests
RFC6608-4-1On receiving an unexpected message in OpenSent state, MUST send NOTIFICATION with Error Code 5 (FSM Error) and Subcode 1 ("Receive Unexpected Message in OpenSent State"), with Data field containing the 1-octet message type (Section 4)
MUST 4
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test

{gap}: ze defines and decodes the RFC 6608 subcodes (internal/component/bgp/message/notification.go:110-113, internal/component/bgp/format/decode.go:316-320) but never sends them -- the reactor dispatches received messages by type with no FSM-state guard (internal/component/bgp/reactor/session_read.go:260-273), and no code path emits a code-5 FSM Error NOTIFICATION with subcode 1 on an unexpected message in OpenSent. Disclosed in the docs/features/rfc-status.md RFC 6608 row

RFC6608-4-2On receiving an unexpected message in OpenConfirm state, MUST send NOTIFICATION with Error Code 5 (FSM Error) and Subcode 2 ("Receive Unexpected Message in OpenConfirm State"), with Data field containing the 1-octet message type (Section 4)
MUST 4
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test

{gap}: same root cause as 4-1 -- ze decodes the RFC 6608 subcodes but no reactor path sends a code-5 FSM Error NOTIFICATION with subcode 2 on an unexpected message in OpenConfirm (session_read.go:260-273). Disclosed in the docs/features/rfc-status.md RFC 6608 row

RFC6608-4-3On receiving an unexpected message in Established state, MUST send NOTIFICATION with Error Code 5 (FSM Error) and Subcode 3 ("Receive Unexpected Message in Established State"), with Data field containing the 1-octet message type (Section 4)
MUST 4
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test

{gap}: same root cause as 4-1 -- ze decodes the RFC 6608 subcodes but no reactor path sends a code-5 FSM Error NOTIFICATION with subcode 3 on an unexpected message in Established (session_read.go:260-273). Disclosed in the docs/features/rfc-status.md RFC 6608 row

Gaps and untested MUSTs

RequirementStateReason
RFC6608-4-1 On receiving an unexpected message in OpenSent state, MUST send NOTIFICATION with Error Code 5 (FSM Error) and Subcode 1 ("Receive Unexpected Message in OpenSent State"), with Data field containing the 1-octet message type (Section 4) {gap}, no test ze defines and decodes the RFC 6608 subcodes (internal/component/bgp/message/notification.go:110-113, internal/component/bgp/format/decode.go:316-320) but never sends them -- the reactor dispatches received messages by type with no FSM-state guard (internal/component/bgp/reactor/session_read.go:260-273), and no code path emits a code-5 FSM Error NOTIFICATION with subcode 1 on an unexpected message in OpenSent. Disclosed in the docs/features/rfc-status.md RFC 6608 row
RFC6608-4-2 On receiving an unexpected message in OpenConfirm state, MUST send NOTIFICATION with Error Code 5 (FSM Error) and Subcode 2 ("Receive Unexpected Message in OpenConfirm State"), with Data field containing the 1-octet message type (Section 4) {gap}, no test same root cause as 4-1 -- ze decodes the RFC 6608 subcodes but no reactor path sends a code-5 FSM Error NOTIFICATION with subcode 2 on an unexpected message in OpenConfirm (session_read.go:260-273). Disclosed in the docs/features/rfc-status.md RFC 6608 row
RFC6608-4-3 On receiving an unexpected message in Established state, MUST send NOTIFICATION with Error Code 5 (FSM Error) and Subcode 3 ("Receive Unexpected Message in Established State"), with Data field containing the 1-octet message type (Section 4) {gap}, no test same root cause as 4-1 -- ze decodes the RFC 6608 subcodes but no reactor path sends a code-5 FSM Error NOTIFICATION with subcode 3 on an unexpected message in Established (session_read.go:260-273). Disclosed in the docs/features/rfc-status.md RFC 6608 row

Proof state

A tagged unit reads unproven where no discrimination record exists for it: nothing in this tree has been observed to break it, so the claim its tag makes is unproven.

RFC6608-4-1

On receiving an unexpected message in OpenSent state, MUST send NOTIFICATION with Error Code 5 (FSM Error) and Subcode 1 ("Receive Unexpected Message in OpenSent State"), with Data field containing the 1-octet message type (Section 4)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC6608-4-1, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC6608-4-2

On receiving an unexpected message in OpenConfirm state, MUST send NOTIFICATION with Error Code 5 (FSM Error) and Subcode 2 ("Receive Unexpected Message in OpenConfirm State"), with Data field containing the 1-octet message type (Section 4)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC6608-4-2, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC6608-4-3

On receiving an unexpected message in Established state, MUST send NOTIFICATION with Error Code 5 (FSM Error) and Subcode 3 ("Receive Unexpected Message in Established State"), with Data field containing the 1-octet message type (Section 4)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC6608-4-3, so no unit is bound to it.

Extraction sign-off

No extraction sign-off exists for RFC 6608, so no reviewer has walked its text sentence by sentence.

Superseded

No document obsoletes RFC 6608, so its obligations are stated where they were written.