Supported

RFC 5282 - Using Authenticated Encryption Algorithms with the Encrypted Payload of the Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) Protocol

Every requirement this repository extracted from RFC 5282, the tests bound to it, and what a reader has verified about them. This summary is enrolled and gated by ./le rfc check.

Overview

Positive

what Ze has

Tested both ways5.3%1 of 19 binding obligations

a positive test proves Ze does what the requirement demands and a negative one proves it refuses what the requirement forbids

One polarity plus reason0.0%0 of 19 binding obligations

the requirement admits no counter-case, so one polarity plus a recorded reason is the whole proof available for it

One polarity, unexcused0.0%0 of 19 binding obligations

one direction is tested, the other is neither tested nor excused, and nothing states which

Proven by a recorded break0.0%0 of 2 tagged units

a red was observed once under a recorded procedure, and the unit, the claim and the producer it rested on still hash to what was recorded. The break is not re-run. A test pair is not a proof until one has been observed

Neutral

measures that are neither good news nor bad

Gated MUSTs19of 30 this summary declares

MUST-level requirements the gate HOLDS. A population, not a result: the shares beside it are what says how Ze stands

Out of scope0of 19 gated MUSTs

a {not-applicable} annotation says the obligation does not bind Ze. Scope, not coverage: it is in no share below

Negative

what Ze owes

No test at all94.7%18 of 19 binding obligations

no test carries the requirement id, whether or not a gap states why

The 4 shares marked as a part above are the whole of the 19 obligations that bind Ze: they add to 100%. Proven by a recorded break is a share of TAGGED UNITS, a different population, so it is not one of them.

How to read the colors

A color names what the measure MEANS, not how well Ze scores on it. Green is a good outcome at any value, red is a bad one, and neither a population nor a scope count is an outcome, so both take no color. The number under the label is what says how far Ze has got.

CardTone hereWhy that color
Gated MUSTs neutral no color: a population is a scale, and a larger one is neither good news nor bad. It is the accounting total
Out of scope neutral no color: an obligation that never bound Ze is neither an achievement nor a failure, and counting it either way would be a claim
Tested both ways ok green at every value: a test pair is the outcome this gate exists to produce, and the share under the label is what says how far Ze has got
One polarity plus reason ok green at every value: where no counter-case exists, one polarity IS the complete answer, and a recorded reason is what the gate demands beside it
One polarity, unexcused ok green at zero, RED above it: half a proof with no reason for the other half
No test at all bad green at zero, RED above it: a binding obligation nothing exercises is a claim with nothing behind it, whether or not a reason is stated
Proven by a recorded break ok green at every value: an observed break is the outcome the discrimination gate exists to produce. The denominator is TAGGED UNITS, not obligations, so this share is not one of the parts above
Audit verdicts warn RED on the first weak, wrong or unimplemented verdict, amber while a verdict is no longer current or a gated MUST is unjudged, green when every one is judged sound and current

At a glance

FieldValue
Public status Supported
Enrolment Enrolled
Requirements 30
Gated MUST-level 19
Obligations that bind Ze 19
Not applicable, so out of scope 0
Declared gaps 0
Gated with no test 18
Nightly-only evidence 0
Test tags 2
Tagged units 2
Recorded audit verdicts 0
Discrimination records 0
Summary rfc/short/rfc5282.md
Requirement shard rfc/requirements/rfc5282.md
RFC text rfc/full/rfc5282.txt

Enrolment

Enrolled: Using AEAD Algorithms with the IKEv2 Encrypted Payload (RFC 5282): ze speaks one AEAD cipher for the IKE SA, ENCR_AES_GCM_16 (Transform ID 20) at 128 and 256 bits. buildSKMessageAEADWithMsgID (engine/auth.go) seals an 8-octet IV, a salt-then-IV 12-octet nonce and the IKE-header-through-SK-generic-header associated data; decryptSKPayload and crypto.DecryptIKEAEAD (crypto/cipher.go) open it. encKeyMaterialLen (crypto/keys.go) gives SK_ei and SK_er the RFC 4106 KEYMAT layout (cipher key then 4-octet salt) and leaves SK_ai and SK_ar at zero octets. No AES CCM: aeadSaltBytes holds one entry and specifiedEncryption (crypto/proposal.go) accepts no CCM transform off the wire. 19 gated rows, none tested and none annotated at enrolment -- the coverage backlog is reported rather than annotated away, because ai/rules/rfc-compliance.md reserves gap and not-applicable for an owner answer.

What the public ledger says

Status: Supported

What the ledger says is covered:

AES-GCM IKEv2 AEAD encryption and decryption framing.

What the ledger says remains:

No tracked gap in current source anchors.

Coverage

BucketCountWhat it counts
Positive and negative tests 1 one part of the gated population
Annotated instead of tested 0 one part of the gated population
One polarity only 0 one part of the gated population
No test and no annotation 18 one part of the gated population
Evidence that runs nightly only 0 an overlay: each of these is also counted by the part it falls in
Gated MUST-level requirements19every gated MUST falls in exactly one bucket above

Positive and negative tests (1): RFC5282-8-2

No test and no annotation (18): RFC5282-3-1, RFC5282-3.1-1, RFC5282-3.1-2, RFC5282-3.2-1, RFC5282-3.2-2, RFC5282-3.2-3, RFC5282-3.2-4, RFC5282-4-1, RFC5282-4-2, RFC5282-4-3, RFC5282-4-4, RFC5282-5.1-1, RFC5282-5.1-2, RFC5282-7.1-1, RFC5282-7.1-2, RFC5282-7.3-1, RFC5282-7.3-2, RFC5282-8-1

Requirements

RequirementLevelSectionTests
RFC5282-3-1The recipient MUST accept any amount of Padding up to 255 octets (§3)
MUST 3
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-3.1-1The Initialization Vector MUST be eight octets (§3.1)
MUST 3.1
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-3.1-2The IV MUST be chosen by the encryptor in a manner that ensures the same IV value is used only once for a given key (§3.1)
MUST 3.1
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-3.2-1AES GCM implementations MUST support a full-length 16 octet ICV (§3.2)
MUST 3.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-3.2-2AES GCM implementations MUST NOT support ICV lengths other than 16, 8 and 12 octets (§3.2)
MUST NOT 3.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-3.2-3AES CCM implementations MUST support ICV sizes of 8 octets and 16 octets (§3.2)
MUST 3.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-3.2-4AES CCM implementations MUST NOT support ICV lengths other than 8, 16 and 12 octets (§3.2)
MUST NOT 3.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-4-1For AES GCM the default nonce format MUST be used, the salt concatenated with the IV in that order (§4)
MUST 4
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-4-2For AES GCM a 12 octet nonce MUST be used (§4)
MUST 4
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-4-3For AES CCM the default nonce format MUST be used, the salt concatenated with the IV in that order (§4)
MUST 4
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-4-4For AES CCM an 11 octet nonce MUST be used (§4)
MUST 4
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-5.1-1The associated data MUST consist of the message from the first octet of the Fixed IKE Header through the last octet of the Encrypted Payload's Payload Header, including any payloads between them (§5.1)
MUST 5.1
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-5.1-2The Initialization Vector and Ciphertext fields MUST NOT be included in the associated data (§5.1)
MUST NOT 5.1
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-7.1-1With an AEAD cipher the SK_ai and SK_ar integrity keys are unused, and each MUST be treated as having a size of zero octets (§7.1)
MUST 7.1
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-7.1-2Each of SK_ei and SK_er MUST have the size and format of the KEYMAT for the AES key size in use, the cipher key followed by the salt (§7.1)
MUST 7.1
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-7.3-1The Key Length attribute MUST be specified whenever an AES GCM or AES CCM encryption transform identifier is used (§7.3)
MUST 7.3
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-7.3-2The Key Length attribute MUST have a value of 128, 192, or 256 (§7.3)
MUST 7.3
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-8-1When an authenticated encryption algorithm is selected as the encryption algorithm for any SA, an integrity algorithm MUST NOT be selected for that SA (§8)
MUST NOT 8
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-8-2If all of the encryption algorithms in a proposal are authenticated encryption algorithms, the proposal MUST NOT propose any integrity transforms (§8)
MUST NOT 8
RFC5282-4-5Specific authenticated encryption algorithms SHOULD use the default nonce format (§4)
SHOULD 4
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-7.2-1A 16-octet ICV size SHOULD be used with IKEv2 (§7.2)
SHOULD 7.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-7.2-2The use of 12-octet ICVs, transform identifiers 15 and 19, is discouraged (§7.2)
NOT RECOMMENDED 7.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-7.2-3If an ICV size larger than 8 octets is appropriate, 16-octet ICVs SHOULD be used (§7.2)
SHOULD 7.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-7.3-3The use of the Key Length value 192 is discouraged (§7.3)
NOT RECOMMENDED 7.3
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-7.3-4If an AES key larger than 128 bits is appropriate, a 256-bit AES key SHOULD be used (§7.3)
SHOULD 7.3
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-3-2Padding MAY contain any value chosen by the sender (§3)
MAY 3
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-3.1-3The encryptor MAY generate the IV in any manner that ensures uniqueness (§3.1)
MAY 3.1
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-3.2-5AES GCM implementations MAY support 8 or 12 octet ICVs (§3.2)
MAY 3.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-3.2-6AES CCM implementations MAY also support 12 octet ICVs (§3.2)
MAY 3.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC5282-4-6Specific authenticated encryption algorithms MAY use different nonce formats (§4)
MAY 4
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test

Gaps and untested MUSTs

RequirementStateReason
RFC5282-3-1 The recipient MUST accept any amount of Padding up to 255 octets (§3) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-3.1-1 The Initialization Vector MUST be eight octets (§3.1) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-3.1-2 The IV MUST be chosen by the encryptor in a manner that ensures the same IV value is used only once for a given key (§3.1) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-3.2-1 AES GCM implementations MUST support a full-length 16 octet ICV (§3.2) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-3.2-2 AES GCM implementations MUST NOT support ICV lengths other than 16, 8 and 12 octets (§3.2) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-3.2-3 AES CCM implementations MUST support ICV sizes of 8 octets and 16 octets (§3.2) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-3.2-4 AES CCM implementations MUST NOT support ICV lengths other than 8, 16 and 12 octets (§3.2) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-4-1 For AES GCM the default nonce format MUST be used, the salt concatenated with the IV in that order (§4) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-4-2 For AES GCM a 12 octet nonce MUST be used (§4) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-4-3 For AES CCM the default nonce format MUST be used, the salt concatenated with the IV in that order (§4) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-4-4 For AES CCM an 11 octet nonce MUST be used (§4) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-5.1-1 The associated data MUST consist of the message from the first octet of the Fixed IKE Header through the last octet of the Encrypted Payload's Payload Header, including any payloads between them (§5.1) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-5.1-2 The Initialization Vector and Ciphertext fields MUST NOT be included in the associated data (§5.1) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-7.1-1 With an AEAD cipher the SK_ai and SK_ar integrity keys are unused, and each MUST be treated as having a size of zero octets (§7.1) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-7.1-2 Each of SK_ei and SK_er MUST have the size and format of the KEYMAT for the AES key size in use, the cipher key followed by the salt (§7.1) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-7.3-1 The Key Length attribute MUST be specified whenever an AES GCM or AES CCM encryption transform identifier is used (§7.3) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-7.3-2 The Key Length attribute MUST have a value of 128, 192, or 256 (§7.3) no test no test carries this requirement id
RFC5282-8-1 When an authenticated encryption algorithm is selected as the encryption algorithm for any SA, an integrity algorithm MUST NOT be selected for that SA (§8) no test no test carries this requirement id

Proof state

A tagged unit reads unproven where no discrimination record exists for it: nothing in this tree has been observed to break it, so the claim its tag makes is unproven.

RFC5282-3-1

The recipient MUST accept any amount of Padding up to 255 octets (§3)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-3-1, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-3.1-1

The Initialization Vector MUST be eight octets (§3.1)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-3.1-1, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-3.1-2

The IV MUST be chosen by the encryptor in a manner that ensures the same IV value is used only once for a given key (§3.1)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-3.1-2, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-3.2-1

AES GCM implementations MUST support a full-length 16 octet ICV (§3.2)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-3.2-1, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-3.2-2

AES GCM implementations MUST NOT support ICV lengths other than 16, 8 and 12 octets (§3.2)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-3.2-2, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-3.2-3

AES CCM implementations MUST support ICV sizes of 8 octets and 16 octets (§3.2)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-3.2-3, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-3.2-4

AES CCM implementations MUST NOT support ICV lengths other than 8, 16 and 12 octets (§3.2)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-3.2-4, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-4-1

For AES GCM the default nonce format MUST be used, the salt concatenated with the IV in that order (§4)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-4-1, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-4-2

For AES GCM a 12 octet nonce MUST be used (§4)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-4-2, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-4-3

For AES CCM the default nonce format MUST be used, the salt concatenated with the IV in that order (§4)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-4-3, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-4-4

For AES CCM an 11 octet nonce MUST be used (§4)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-4-4, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-5.1-1

The associated data MUST consist of the message from the first octet of the Fixed IKE Header through the last octet of the Encrypted Payload's Payload Header, including any payloads between them (§5.1)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-5.1-1, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-5.1-2

The Initialization Vector and Ciphertext fields MUST NOT be included in the associated data (§5.1)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-5.1-2, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-7.1-1

With an AEAD cipher the SK_ai and SK_ar integrity keys are unused, and each MUST be treated as having a size of zero octets (§7.1)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-7.1-1, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-7.1-2

Each of SK_ei and SK_er MUST have the size and format of the KEYMAT for the AES key size in use, the cipher key followed by the salt (§7.1)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-7.1-2, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-7.3-1

The Key Length attribute MUST be specified whenever an AES GCM or AES CCM encryption transform identifier is used (§7.3)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-7.3-1, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-7.3-2

The Key Length attribute MUST have a value of 128, 192, or 256 (§7.3)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-7.3-2, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-8-1

When an authenticated encryption algorithm is selected as the encryption algorithm for any SA, an integrity algorithm MUST NOT be selected for that SA (§8)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC5282-8-1, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC5282-8-2

If all of the encryption algorithms in a proposal are authenticated encryption algorithms, the proposal MUST NOT propose any integrity transforms (§8)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

PolarityTestKind and tierProof state
negative TestRFC5282NonAEADIKEProposalKeepsItsIntegrityTransform unit/verify unproven
positive TestRFC5282AEADIKEProposalCarriesNoIntegrityTransform unit/verify unproven

Extraction sign-off

FieldValue
Reviewer claude-opus-5 (ipsecwalk), spec-rfcgate-6-supported-extraction-signoff
Signed off 2026-08-31
Register prose
Source rfc/full/rfc5282.txt
Source fingerprint e4b60d44518cbcd7
Record rfc/extraction/rfc5282.json
Mapped sentences 16
Declined as scope 3
Relocated to a spec, which Ze OWES 0
Unclassified 0

Sections

SectionNameSitesDispositionReason
front Status of This Memo, Abstract and Table of Contents 0 skipped (front-matter) Status of This Memo, Abstract and Table of Contents.
1 not stated 0 walked not stated
1.1 not stated 0 walked not stated
2 not stated 0 walked not stated
3 not stated 1 walked not stated
3.1 not stated 2 walked not stated
3.2 not stated 3 walked not stated
4 not stated 2 walked not stated
5 not stated 0 walked not stated
5.1 not stated 2 walked not stated
5.2 not stated 0 walked not stated
6 not stated 0 walked not stated
7 not stated 0 walked not stated
7.1 not stated 2 walked not stated
7.2 not stated 0 walked not stated
7.3 not stated 2 walked not stated
8 not stated 3 walked not stated
9 not stated 0 walked not stated
10 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.1 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.1.1 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.1.2 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.1.3 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.1.4 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.2 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.2.1 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.2.2 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.2.3 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.2.4 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.2.5 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.2.6 not stated 0 walked not stated
10.3 not stated 0 walked not stated
11 not stated 0 walked not stated
12 not stated 1 skipped (iana) IANA Considerations: the transform identifiers were already assigned for ESP, and the AEAD registry rows are a registry action rather than an implementation obligation.
13 Acknowledgments 0 skipped (acknowledgements) Acknowledgments.
14 References 0 skipped (references) References.
14.1 Normative References 0 skipped (references) Normative References.
14.2 Informative References 1 skipped (references) Informative References.

Excluded sentences

SiteExcluded kindReasonQuote
8:1 cross-document
never bound Ze
the obligation belongs to another document that this one only cites
The sentence states what RFC 4306 Section 3.3.3 requires, so the obligation it carries belongs to that document; it is quoted here only as the rule the next two sentences update. Sites 8:2 and 8:3 carry the update this document makes, and both are mapped. IKEv2 (Section 3.3.3 of [RFC4306]) specifies that both an encryption algorithm and an integrity checking algorithm are required for an IKE SA (Security Association).
12:1 not-a-requirement
never bound Ze
the sentence states a fact or describes another document, and directs no implementation
An IANA statement that no registry action is needed for the transform identifiers this document reuses. It imposes nothing on an implementation, and the lowercase 'required' the prose scan matched is the report of an absence. No IANA actions are required for this usage extension.
14.2:1 not-a-requirement
never bound Ze
the sentence states a fact or describes another document, and directs no implementation
IPR boilerplate reproduced from the informative reference section. It addresses 'any interested party' about patent disclosure and states no protocol behavior. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard.

Superseded

No document obsoletes RFC 5282, so its obligations are stated where they were written.