Partial

RFC 4684 - Constrained Route Distribution for Border Gateway Protocol/MultiProtocol Label Switching (BGP/MPLS) Internet Protocol (IP) Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)

Every requirement this repository extracted from RFC 4684, the tests bound to it, and what a reader has verified about them. This summary is enrolled and gated by ./le rfc check.

Overview

Positive

what Ze has

Tested both ways0.0%0 of 4 binding obligations

a positive test proves Ze does what the requirement demands and a negative one proves it refuses what the requirement forbids

One polarity plus reason0.0%0 of 4 binding obligations

the requirement admits no counter-case, so one polarity plus a recorded reason is the whole proof available for it

One polarity, unexcused0.0%0 of 4 binding obligations

one direction is tested, the other is neither tested nor excused, and nothing states which

Proven by a recorded break0.0%0 of 0 tagged units

a red was observed once under a recorded procedure, and the unit, the claim and the producer it rested on still hash to what was recorded. The break is not re-run. A test pair is not a proof until one has been observed

Neutral

measures that are neither good news nor bad

Gated MUSTs4of 8 this summary declares

MUST-level requirements the gate HOLDS. A population, not a result: the shares beside it are what says how Ze stands

Out of scope0of 4 gated MUSTs

a {not-applicable} annotation says the obligation does not bind Ze. Scope, not coverage: it is in no share below

Negative

what Ze owes

No test at all100.0%4 of 4 binding obligations

no test carries the requirement id, whether or not a gap states why

The 4 shares marked as a part above are the whole of the 4 obligations that bind Ze: they add to 100%. Proven by a recorded break is a share of TAGGED UNITS, a different population, so it is not one of them.

How to read the colors

A color names what the measure MEANS, not how well Ze scores on it. Green is a good outcome at any value, red is a bad one, and neither a population nor a scope count is an outcome, so both take no color. The number under the label is what says how far Ze has got.

CardTone hereWhy that color
Gated MUSTs neutral no color: a population is a scale, and a larger one is neither good news nor bad. It is the accounting total
Out of scope neutral no color: an obligation that never bound Ze is neither an achievement nor a failure, and counting it either way would be a claim
Tested both ways ok green at every value: a test pair is the outcome this gate exists to produce, and the share under the label is what says how far Ze has got
One polarity plus reason ok green at every value: where no counter-case exists, one polarity IS the complete answer, and a recorded reason is what the gate demands beside it
One polarity, unexcused ok green at zero, RED above it: half a proof with no reason for the other half
No test at all bad green at zero, RED above it: a binding obligation nothing exercises is a claim with nothing behind it, whether or not a reason is stated
Proven by a recorded break ok green at every value: an observed break is the outcome the discrimination gate exists to produce. The denominator is TAGGED UNITS, not obligations, so this share is not one of the parts above
Audit verdicts warn RED on the first weak, wrong or unimplemented verdict, amber while a verdict is no longer current or a gated MUST is unjudged, green when every one is judged sound and current

At a glance

FieldValue
Public status Partial
Enrolment Enrolled
Requirements 8
Gated MUST-level 4
Obligations that bind Ze 4
Not applicable, so out of scope 0
Declared gaps 4
Gated with no test 0
Nightly-only evidence 0
Test tags 0
Tagged units 0
Recorded audit verdicts 0
Discrimination records 0
Summary rfc/short/rfc4684.md
Requirement shard rfc/requirements/rfc4684.md
RFC text rfc/full/rfc4684.txt

Enrolment

Enrolled: Constrained Route Distribution for BGP/MPLS VPNs (Route Target Constraint): four MUST-level requirements, all {gap}. Ze implements RTC as a DECODE-ONLY NLRI codec for display/analysis (internal/component/bgp/plugins/nlri/rtc/rtc.go DecodeNLRIHex/RunDecode) with no encode/origination path and no RT-membership distribution. RFC4684-3.2-1 (Originator/Next-hop when advertising RT membership NLRI) and RFC4684-3.2-2 (best-path/client-path advertisement selection): Ze never advertises RT membership NLRI. RFC4684-3.2-3 (consider all iBGP paths for the outbound route filter): Ze builds no ORF from RT membership. RFC4684-6-1 (bound the End-of-RIB delay for VPN route advertisement): Ze gates no VPN route advertisement on RT-membership state. Disclosed in the docs/features/rfc-status.md RFC 4684 row (Partial). The 6-2/6-3/8-1 SHOULDs and 5-1 MAY are not gated.

What the public ledger says

Status: Partial

What the ledger says is covered:

RTC NLRI decode for display/analysis (ze bgp decode). Tests bound per requirement in rfc/requirements/rfc4684.md.
What the ledger says remains Decode-only: no encode/origination path and no RT-membership distribution. Four MUST gaps gated in rfc/short/rfc4684.md: Ze does not advertise RT membership NLRI (so no §3.2 Originator/Next-hop or best-path/client-path selection), builds no outbound route filter from RT membership (§3.2), and gates no VPN route advertisement on RT-membership End-of-RIB (§6).

Coverage

BucketCountWhat it counts
Positive and negative tests 0 one part of the gated population
Annotated instead of tested 4 one part of the gated population
One polarity only 0 one part of the gated population
No test and no annotation 0 one part of the gated population
Evidence that runs nightly only 0 an overlay: each of these is also counted by the part it falls in
Gated MUST-level requirements4every gated MUST falls in exactly one bucket above

Annotated instead of tested (4): RFC4684-3.2-1, RFC4684-3.2-2, RFC4684-3.2-3, RFC4684-6-1

Requirements

RequirementLevelSectionTests
RFC4684-3.2-1When advertising RT membership NLRI to a route-reflector client, the Originator attribute shall be set to the router-id of the advertiser, and the Next-hop attribute shall be set to the local address for that session (Section 3.2)
MUST 3.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test

{gap}: Ze implements RTC (Route Target Constraint) as a DECODE-ONLY NLRI codec for display/analysis (internal/component/bgp/plugins/nlri/rtc/rtc.go DecodeNLRIHex/RunDecode; there is no encode/origination path). It never advertises RT membership NLRI, so it implements none of the Section 3.2 advertisement Originator/Next-hop procedure. Disclosed in docs/features/rfc-status.md.

RFC4684-3.2-2When advertising RT membership NLRI to a non-client peer, if best path is from a non-client peer and an alternative client path exists, advertise the client path attributes (Section 3.2)
MUST 3.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test

{gap}: Ze does not advertise RT membership NLRI at all (its RTC support is a decode-only NLRI codec, internal/component/bgp/plugins/nlri/rtc/rtc.go, with no origination path), so it implements none of the Section 3.2 best-path/client-path advertisement selection. Disclosed in docs/features/rfc-status.md.

RFC4684-3.2-3When processing RT membership NLRIs from internal iBGP peers, consider all available iBGP paths for a given RT prefix for building the outbound route filter, not just the best path (Section 3.2)
MUST 3.2
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test

{gap}: Ze builds no outbound route filter from RT membership -- its RTC support is a decode-only NLRI codec (internal/component/bgp/plugins/nlri/rtc/rtc.go) with no ORF construction or RT-membership-driven VPN route filtering. Disclosed in docs/features/rfc-status.md.

RFC4684-6-1If delaying VPN route advertisement until End-of-RIB marker is received, MUST limit that delay to an upper bound (Section 6)
MUST 6
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test

{gap}: Ze does not gate VPN route advertisement on RT-membership state -- it has no RTC-driven VPN route distribution (the RTC codec is decode-only, internal/component/bgp/plugins/nlri/rtc/rtc.go), so there is no such End-of-RIB delay for Ze to bound. Disclosed in docs/features/rfc-status.md.

RFC4684-6-2Implementations SHOULD generate an End-of-RIB marker for Route Target membership (AFI=1, SAFI=132) regardless of whether graceful-restart is enabled (Section 6)
SHOULD 6
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC4684-6-3A BGP speaker should generate the minimum set of BGP VPN route updates necessary to transition between the previous and current state of the route distribution graph (Section 6)
SHOULD 6
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC4684-8-1Implementations SHOULD provide means to filter RT membership information (Section 8)
SHOULD 8
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test
RFC4684-5-1A BGP speaker MAY participate in distribution of Route Target information without using it for VPN NLRI output route filtering (Section 5)
MAY 5
positiveno testno positive test
negativeno testno negative test

Gaps and untested MUSTs

RequirementStateReason
RFC4684-3.2-1 When advertising RT membership NLRI to a route-reflector client, the Originator attribute shall be set to the router-id of the advertiser, and the Next-hop attribute shall be set to the local address for that session (Section 3.2) {gap}, no test Ze implements RTC (Route Target Constraint) as a DECODE-ONLY NLRI codec for display/analysis (internal/component/bgp/plugins/nlri/rtc/rtc.go DecodeNLRIHex/RunDecode; there is no encode/origination path). It never advertises RT membership NLRI, so it implements none of the Section 3.2 advertisement Originator/Next-hop procedure. Disclosed in docs/features/rfc-status.md.
RFC4684-3.2-2 When advertising RT membership NLRI to a non-client peer, if best path is from a non-client peer and an alternative client path exists, advertise the client path attributes (Section 3.2) {gap}, no test Ze does not advertise RT membership NLRI at all (its RTC support is a decode-only NLRI codec, internal/component/bgp/plugins/nlri/rtc/rtc.go, with no origination path), so it implements none of the Section 3.2 best-path/client-path advertisement selection. Disclosed in docs/features/rfc-status.md.
RFC4684-3.2-3 When processing RT membership NLRIs from internal iBGP peers, consider all available iBGP paths for a given RT prefix for building the outbound route filter, not just the best path (Section 3.2) {gap}, no test Ze builds no outbound route filter from RT membership -- its RTC support is a decode-only NLRI codec (internal/component/bgp/plugins/nlri/rtc/rtc.go) with no ORF construction or RT-membership-driven VPN route filtering. Disclosed in docs/features/rfc-status.md.
RFC4684-6-1 If delaying VPN route advertisement until End-of-RIB marker is received, MUST limit that delay to an upper bound (Section 6) {gap}, no test Ze does not gate VPN route advertisement on RT-membership state -- it has no RTC-driven VPN route distribution (the RTC codec is decode-only, internal/component/bgp/plugins/nlri/rtc/rtc.go), so there is no such End-of-RIB delay for Ze to bound. Disclosed in docs/features/rfc-status.md.

Proof state

A tagged unit reads unproven where no discrimination record exists for it: nothing in this tree has been observed to break it, so the claim its tag makes is unproven.

RFC4684-3.2-1

When advertising RT membership NLRI to a route-reflector client, the Originator attribute shall be set to the router-id of the advertiser, and the Next-hop attribute shall be set to the local address for that session (Section 3.2)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC4684-3.2-1, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC4684-3.2-2

When advertising RT membership NLRI to a non-client peer, if best path is from a non-client peer and an alternative client path exists, advertise the client path attributes (Section 3.2)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC4684-3.2-2, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC4684-3.2-3

When processing RT membership NLRIs from internal iBGP peers, consider all available iBGP paths for a given RT prefix for building the outbound route filter, not just the best path (Section 3.2)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC4684-3.2-3, so no unit is bound to it.

RFC4684-6-1

If delaying VPN route advertisement until End-of-RIB marker is received, MUST limit that delay to an upper bound (Section 6)

Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests

No test carries RFC4684-6-1, so no unit is bound to it.

Extraction sign-off

No extraction sign-off exists for RFC 4684, so no reviewer has walked its text sentence by sentence.

Superseded

No document obsoletes RFC 4684, so its obligations are stated where they were written.