a positive test proves Ze does what the requirement demands and a negative one proves it refuses what the requirement forbids
RFC 2661 - Layer Two Tunneling Protocol "L2TP"
Every requirement this repository extracted from RFC 2661, the tests bound to it, and what a reader has verified about them. This summary is enrolled and gated by ./le rfc check.
Overview
Positive
what Ze has
the requirement admits no counter-case, so one polarity plus a recorded reason is the whole proof available for it
one direction is tested, the other is neither tested nor excused, and nothing states which
a red was observed once under a recorded procedure, and the unit, the claim and the producer it rested on still hash to what was recorded. The break is not re-run. A test pair is not a proof until one has been observed
Neutral
measures that are neither good news nor bad
MUST-level requirements the gate HOLDS. A population, not a result: the shares beside it are what says how Ze stands
an obligation that does not bind Ze. A {not-applicable} annotation says it never bound; a {feature-declined} annotation says its condition is an optional feature Ze does not offer, and quotes the RFC sentence that makes it optional. Scope, not coverage: it stays in the denominator every share on this page is taken over
a {not-applicable} annotation says the obligation does not bind Ze, so no test is owed for it. It stays in the denominator every share here is taken over
a {lower-layer} annotation says a layer under Ze performs the behavior, on state Ze installs into that layer, and names the producer that installs it. The obligation binds Ze and is met; Ze proves none of it, because its own boundary carries no value the behavior reads
a {feature-declined} annotation says the obligation is conditional on a feature the RFC makes optional and Ze does not offer, and it quotes the sentence that makes it optional. The condition is false, so nothing is owed and nothing is missing. It stays in the denominator every share here is taken over
Negative
what Ze owes
no test carries the requirement id, whether or not a gap states why
The 7 shares marked as a part above are the whole of the 20 gated MUSTs: they add to 100%. Proven by a recorded break is a share of TAGGED UNITS, a different population, so it is not one of them.
How to read the colors
A color names what the measure MEANS, not how well Ze scores on it. Green is a good outcome at any value, red is a bad one, and neither a population nor a scope count is an outcome, so both take no color. The number under the label is what says how far Ze has got.
| Card | Tone here | Why that color |
|---|---|---|
| Gated MUSTs | neutral | no color: a population is a scale, and a larger one is neither good news nor bad. It is the accounting total |
| Out of scope | neutral | no color: an obligation that never bound Ze is neither an achievement nor a failure, and counting it either way would be a claim |
| Tested both ways | ok | green at every value: a test pair is the outcome this gate exists to produce, and the share under the label is what says how far Ze has got |
| One polarity plus reason | ok | green at every value: where no counter-case exists, one polarity IS the complete answer, and a recorded reason is what the gate demands beside it |
| One polarity, unexcused | ok | green at zero, RED above it: half a proof with no reason for the other half |
| No test at all | bad | green at zero, RED above it: a binding obligation nothing exercises is a claim with nothing behind it, whether or not a reason is stated |
| Not applicable | neutral | no color: an obligation that never bound Ze is neither an achievement nor a failure, and counting it either way would be a claim |
| Met below Ze | neutral | no color: an obligation met below Ze is neither a test Ze wrote nor work Ze owes, and the two green shares above are what says how much Ze proves itself |
| Optional feature declined | neutral | no color: an obligation whose condition Ze never meets is neither an achievement nor a failure. The absent FEATURE is disclosed on the RFC's own status row, as an implementation gap a later scope decision can revisit |
| Proven by a recorded break | ok | green at every value: an observed break is the outcome the discrimination gate exists to produce. The denominator is TAGGED UNITS, not obligations, so this share is not one of the parts above |
| Audit verdicts | warn | RED on the first weak, wrong or unimplemented verdict, amber while a verdict is no longer current or a gated MUST is unjudged, green when every one is judged sound and current |
At a glance
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Public status | Partial |
| Enrolment | Enrolled |
| Requirements | 27 |
| Gated MUST-level | 20 |
| Not applicable, so out of scope | 0 |
| Declared gaps | 1 |
| Gated with no test | 0 |
| Nightly-only evidence | 0 |
| Test tags | 49 |
| Tagged units | 49 |
| Recorded audit verdicts | 0 |
| Discrimination records | 10 |
| Summary | rfc/short/rfc2661.md |
| Requirement shard | rfc/requirements/rfc2661.md |
| RFC text | rfc/full/rfc2661.txt |
Enrolment
Enrolled: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol / L2TP (RFC 2661): LAC+LNS control plane. 16 MET (AVP format+reserved bits, control-message framing, ICRQ/ICRP session setup, SCCRQ/SCCRP/SCCCN tunnel handshake, SCCRQ and SCCRP mandatory-AVP refusal, unknown-mandatory-AVP teardown, reliable transport max-attempts/retransmit/duplicate-detect/window/post-teardown-ack retention, StopCCN cascade, CDN drop, SID boundary) + 3 single-polarity positive (retransmit backoff schedule, backoff cap >= 8s, control-header reserved bits zero) + 1 gap (hidden-AVP MD5 codec present but not wired: no Random Vector emitted, no H=1 encoder)
What the public ledger says
Status: Partial
What the ledger says is covered
- LNS/LAC tunnel lifecycle (answerer and **initiator**: ze dials SCCRQ, verifies SCCRP, sends SCCCN), AVP codec, hidden-AVP MD5 codec (present but not wired into message encode/decode), challenge/response, reliable control channel, HELLO, StopCCN, data sessions, **LNS-side outgoing call (OCRQ/OCRP/OCCN) via
request l2tp outgoing-call**, dial-target config, LAC PPPoE→L2TP relay (control plane). <!-- source:internal/component/l2tp/tunnel_initiator.go-- initiate/handleSCCRP internal/component/l2tp/session_initiator.go-- placeOutgoingCall/handleOCRP -->
What the ledger says remains
Feature remains Partial; see L2TP guide for operational limits. One MUST gap gated inrfc/short/rfc2661.md: RFC2661-4.3-1 -- the hidden-AVP MD5 cipher (internal/component/l2tp/hidden.go) is implemented and unit-tested but not wired into any message encoder/decoder, so no Random Vector precedes a hidden AVP on send and precedence is not enforced on receive. Initiator tunnel interop proven vs xl2tpd (test/interop-l2tp/scenarios/03). LAC data-plane bridge (A-4) is QEMU/CAP_NET_ADMIN-gated.
Coverage
| Bucket | Count | What it counts |
|---|---|---|
| Positive and negative tests | 16 | one part of the gated population |
| Annotated instead of tested | 4 | one part of the gated population |
| One polarity only | 0 | one part of the gated population |
| No test and no annotation | 0 | one part of the gated population |
| Evidence that runs nightly only | 0 | an overlay: each of these is also counted by the part it falls in |
| Gated MUST-level requirements | 20 | every gated MUST falls in exactly one bucket above |
Positive and negative tests (16): RFC2661-4.1-1, RFC2661-4.1-2, RFC2661-4.1-3, RFC2661-4.1-4, RFC2661-5.8-3, RFC2661-5.8-4, RFC2661-5.8-5, RFC2661-5.8-6, RFC2661-5.8-7, RFC2661-6.1-1, RFC2661-6.2-1, RFC2661-24.10-1, RFC2661-24.12-1, RFC2661-10-1, RFC2661-9-1, RFC2661-10-2
Annotated instead of tested (4): RFC2661-x-1, RFC2661-5.8-1, RFC2661-5.8-2, RFC2661-4.3-1
Requirements
| Requirement | Level | Section | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|
RFC2661-x-1 | Reserved bits 8-11 in L2TP header MUST be 0 (Wire Format) | ||
| MUST | x | negative
no testno negative test{single-polarity}: every control header is the fixed constant 0xC802 and every data header is built from verL2TP|flags, so reserved bits are always emitted zero, and ze never rejects non-zero on receive (internal/component/l2tp/header.go:26, :148-155, :172-207) |
|
RFC2661-4.1-1 | AVP reserved bits 2-5 MUST be zero on send; non-zero on receive means treat AVP as unrecognized (§4.1) | ||
| MUST | 4.1 | ||
RFC2661-4.1-2 | Message Type AVP (type 0) MUST be the first AVP in every control message. RFC 2661 Section 4.4.1: "The Message Type AVP MUST be the first AVP in a message, immediately following the control message header". The id anchor below is frozen and does NOT name Section 4.1, which is AVP Format (§4.1) | ||
| MUST | 4.1 | ||
RFC2661-4.1-3 | If M=1 and AVP is unrecognized and session-scoped, send CDN and tear down session (§4.1) | ||
| MUST | 4.1 | ||
RFC2661-4.1-4 | If M=1 and AVP is unrecognized and tunnel-scoped, send StopCCN and tear down tunnel (§4.1) | ||
| MUST | 4.1 | ||
RFC2661-5.8-1 | Retransmission of control messages MUST use exponential backoff (§5.8) | ||
| MUST | 5.8 | negative
no testno negative test{single-polarity}: the engine doubles the retransmit timeout on each expiry, and exponential growth is a positive behavior with no meaningful negation on a correct implementation (internal/component/l2tp/reliable.go:591-595) |
|
RFC2661-5.8-2 | Backoff cap MUST be at least 8 seconds (§5.8) | ||
| MUST | 5.8 | negative
no testno negative test{single-polarity}: the default backoff cap is the 16s constant and the reactor always constructs engines with RTimeoutCap unset, so the cap is always at least 8s with no config path or floor guard to test negatively (internal/component/l2tp/reliable_seq.go:19, reliable.go:291-292) |
|
RFC2661-5.8-3 | After exhausting retransmissions without response, tunnel and all sessions MUST be cleared (§5.8) | ||
| MUST | 5.8 | ||
RFC2661-5.8-4 | On each retransmit, Ns stays the same but Nr MUST be updated to current next-expected value (§5.8) | ||
| MUST | 5.8 | ||
RFC2661-5.8-5 | Duplicate control messages MUST be acknowledged (via ZLB or piggyback) even though not processed by upper layer (§5.8) | ||
| MUST | 5.8 | ||
RFC2661-5.8-6 | Implementations MUST accept a peer Receive Window Size of up to 4 (§5.8) | ||
| MUST | 5.8 | ||
RFC2661-5.8-7 | State and reliable delivery mechanisms MUST be maintained for the full retransmission interval after the final message exchange (§5.8) | ||
| MUST | 5.8 | ||
RFC2661-4.3-1 | A Random Vector AVP (type 36) MUST precede any hidden AVP (H=1) in the same message (§4.3) | ||
| MUST | 4.3 | positive
no testno positive testnegative
no testno negative test{gap}: the hidden-AVP MD5 cipher is implemented and unit-tested but is not wired into any control-message path -- no encoder sets H=1 or emits a Random Vector, and decoders skip hidden AVPs without decrypting or checking precedence (internal/component/l2tp/hidden.go:38 has no production caller; avp.go:156-168 skips hidden AVPs; AVPRandomVector avp.go:56 never emitted) |
|
RFC2661-6.1-1 | Every AVP RFC 2661 Section 6.1 makes mandatory in an SCCRQ is required, and an SCCRQ missing one is answered with StopCCN rather than dropped in silence. RFC 2661 Section 6.1: "The following AVPs MUST be present in the SCCRQ: Message Type AVP, Protocol Version, Host Name, Framing Capabilities, Assigned Tunnel ID"; RFC 2661 Section 7.1: "Examples of a malformed control message include ... a message that is missing a required AVP", and receipt of one "should be logged appropriately and the control connection cleared to ensure recovery to a known state" (§6.1) | ||
| MUST | 6.1 | ||
RFC2661-6.2-1 | Every AVP RFC 2661 Section 6.2 makes mandatory in an SCCRP is required, and an SCCRP missing one tears the dialed tunnel down with StopCCN rather than establishing it. RFC 2661 Section 6.2: "The following AVPs MUST be present in the SCCRP: Message Type, Protocol Version, Framing Capabilities, Host Name, Assigned Tunnel ID"; RFC 2661 Section 7.2.1 gives wait-ctl-reply the row "Receive SCCRP, not acceptable | Send StopCCN, Clean up | idle" (§6.2) | ||
| MUST | 6.2 | ||
RFC2661-24.10-1 | Assigned Tunnel ID of 0 in SCCRQ/SCCRP is a protocol error; reject with StopCCN. RFC 2661 Section 4.4.3: "The Assigned Tunnel ID is a 2 octet non-zero unsigned integer"; RFC 2661 Section 5.3: the value 0 "MUST NOT be used as an Assigned Session ID or Assigned Tunnel ID". The id anchor below numbers no section of RFC 2661 and is frozen (§24.10) | ||
| MUST | 24.10 | ||
RFC2661-24.12-1 | Unknown M=1 vendor AVP in a session context tears down the session with CDN, not the tunnel with StopCCN. RFC 2661 Section 4.1 states the session/tunnel split and RFC 2661 Section 4.2 states the consequence. The id anchor below numbers no section of RFC 2661 and is frozen (§24.12) | ||
| MUST | 24.12 | ||
RFC2661-10-1 | CDN is valid in any non-idle session state; receiving CDN destroys the session. RFC 2661 Section 5.6 states session teardown by CDN and RFC 2661 Section 7.4.2 gives the state table. The id anchor below is frozen and does NOT name Section 10, which is IANA Considerations (§10) | ||
| MUST | 10 | ||
RFC2661-9-1 | StopCCN cascades: all sessions in a tunnel are cleared when StopCCN is received. RFC 2661 Section 5.7: an implementation "may shut down an entire tunnel and all sessions on the tunnel by sending the StopCCN". The id anchor below is frozen and does NOT name Section 9, which is Security Considerations (§9) | ||
| MUST | 9 | ||
RFC2661-10-2 | Session ID 0 is reserved and never assigned. RFC 2661 Section 5.3: "The value of 0 for Session ID and Tunnel ID is special and MUST NOT be used as an Assigned Session ID or Assigned Tunnel ID". The id anchor below is frozen and does NOT name Section 10, which is IANA Considerations (§10) | ||
| MUST | 10 | ||
RFC2661-5.8-8 | Retransmission count SHOULD be configurable (recommended 5) (§5.8) | ||
| SHOULD | 5.8 | positive
no testno positive testnegative
no testno negative test |
|
RFC2661-x-2 | Slow start and congestion avoidance SHOULD be implemented (CWND/SSTHRESH per Appendix A) (Appendix A) | ||
| SHOULD | x | positive
no testno positive testnegative
no testno negative test |
|
RFC2661-15-1 | HELLO keepalive SHOULD be sent when no control messages received for a configurable period (recommended 60 seconds). RFC 2661 Section 5.5 states the keepalive and RFC 2661 Section 6.5 the message. The id anchor below numbers no section of RFC 2661 and is frozen (§15) | ||
| SHOULD | 15 | positive
no testno positive testnegative
no testno negative test |
|
RFC2661-4.2-1 | Both peers MAY independently challenge each other during tunnel establishment. RFC 2661 Section 5.1.1 states tunnel authentication and RFC 2661 Section 4.4.3 defines the AVPs. The id anchor below is frozen and does NOT name Section 4.2, which is Mandatory AVPs (§4.2) | ||
| MAY | 4.2 | positive
no testno positive testnegative
no testno negative test |
|
RFC2661-4.3-2 | Multiple hidden AVPs MAY share a single Random Vector AVP (§4.3) | ||
| MAY | 4.3 | positive
no testno positive testnegative
no testno negative test |
|
RFC2661-5.8-9 | Out-of-order control messages MAY be queued or discarded (§5.8) | ||
| MAY | 5.8 | positive
no testno positive testnegative
no testno negative test |
|
RFC2661-9.5-1 | Tie Breaker AVP MAY be included in SCCRQ for simultaneous-open resolution. RFC 2661 Section 4.4.3 defines the AVP and its resolution rule; RFC 2661 Section 7.2 names the collision. The id anchor below is frozen and does NOT name Section 9.5, which is Proxy PPP Authentication (§9.5) | ||
| MAY | 9.5 | positive
no testno positive testnegative
no testno negative test |
|
Gaps and untested MUSTs
| Requirement | State | Reason |
|---|---|---|
RFC2661-4.3-1 A Random Vector AVP (type 36) MUST precede any hidden AVP (H=1) in the same message (§4.3) |
{gap}, no test | the hidden-AVP MD5 cipher is implemented and unit-tested but is not wired into any control-message path -- no encoder sets H=1 or emits a Random Vector, and decoders skip hidden AVPs without decrypting or checking precedence (internal/component/l2tp/hidden.go:38 has no production caller; avp.go:156-168 skips hidden AVPs; AVPRandomVector avp.go:56 never emitted) |
Proof state
A tagged unit reads unproven where no discrimination record exists for it: nothing in this tree has been observed to break it, so the claim its tag makes is unproven.
RFC2661-x-1
Reserved bits 8-11 in L2TP header MUST be 0 (Wire Format)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| positive | TestWriteControlHeader |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | rfc2661-emitted-control-shape.ci |
functional/verify | revert, verified |
RFC2661-4.1-1
AVP reserved bits 2-5 MUST be zero on send; non-zero on receive means treat AVP as unrecognized (§4.1)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestAVPIteratorReservedBits |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestAVPCatalogRoundTrip |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | rfc2661-emitted-control-shape.ci |
functional/verify | revert, verified |
RFC2661-4.1-2
Message Type AVP (type 0) MUST be the first AVP in every control message. RFC 2661 Section 4.4.1: "The Message Type AVP MUST be the first AVP in a message, immediately following the control message header". The id anchor below is frozen and does NOT name Section 4.1, which is AVP Format (§4.1)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestReactor_MalformedSCCRQCreatesNoTunnel |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestWriteICRPBody |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | rfc2661-emitted-control-shape.ci |
functional/verify | revert, verified |
RFC2661-4.1-3
If M=1 and AVP is unrecognized and session-scoped, send CDN and tear down session (§4.1)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestSession_UnknownMandatoryAVP |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestSession_IncomingLNS_ICRQ |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-4.1-4
If M=1 and AVP is unrecognized and tunnel-scoped, send StopCCN and tear down tunnel (§4.1)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestTunnelSCCCNUnknownMandatoryAVP_StopCCN |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestTunnelInitiatorHandshake |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-5.8-1
Retransmission of control messages MUST use exponential backoff (§5.8)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| positive | TestTickBackoffSchedule |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-5.8-2
Backoff cap MUST be at least 8 seconds (§5.8)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| positive | TestBackoffCapAtLeast8Seconds |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-5.8-3
After exhausting retransmissions without response, tunnel and all sessions MUST be cleared (§5.8)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestTickMaxAttempts |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestPeerTeardownWithdrawsSubscriberRoute |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestTickMaxAttempts |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-5.8-4
On each retransmit, Ns stays the same but Nr MUST be updated to current next-expected value (§5.8)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestTickRetransmit |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestTickRetransmit |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-5.8-5
Duplicate control messages MUST be acknowledged (via ZLB or piggyback) even though not processed by upper layer (§5.8)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestOnReceiveDuplicate |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestOnReceiveDuplicate |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-5.8-6
Implementations MUST accept a peer Receive Window Size of up to 4 (§5.8)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestWindowPeerRWSZero |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestWindowAvailable |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-5.8-7
State and reliable delivery mechanisms MUST be maintained for the full retransmission interval after the final message exchange (§5.8)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestPostTeardownAckRetention |
unit/verify | unproven |
| negative | TestExpired |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestPostTeardownAckRetention |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestExpired |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-4.3-1
A Random Vector AVP (type 36) MUST precede any hidden AVP (H=1) in the same message (§4.3)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
No test carries RFC2661-4.3-1, so no unit is bound to it.
RFC2661-6.1-1
Every AVP RFC 2661 Section 6.1 makes mandatory in an SCCRQ is required, and an SCCRQ missing one is answered with StopCCN rather than dropped in silence. RFC 2661 Section 6.1: "The following AVPs MUST be present in the SCCRQ: Message Type AVP, Protocol Version, Host Name, Framing Capabilities, Assigned Tunnel ID"; RFC 2661 Section 7.1: "Examples of a malformed control message include ... a message that is missing a required AVP", and receipt of one "should be logged appropriately and the control connection cleared to ensure recovery to a known state" (§6.1)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestSCCRQMissingMandatoryAVPIsAnswered |
unit/verify | revert, verified |
| negative | TestSCCRQWithShortFramingCapabilitiesIsAnswered |
unit/verify | revert, verified |
| negative | rfc2661-sccrq-mandatory-avp.ci |
functional/verify | revert, verified |
| positive | TestSCCRQWithEveryMandatoryAVPEstablishes |
unit/verify | revert, verified |
| positive | rfc2661-sccrq-mandatory-avp.ci |
functional/verify | revert, verified |
RFC2661-6.2-1
Every AVP RFC 2661 Section 6.2 makes mandatory in an SCCRP is required, and an SCCRP missing one tears the dialed tunnel down with StopCCN rather than establishing it. RFC 2661 Section 6.2: "The following AVPs MUST be present in the SCCRP: Message Type, Protocol Version, Framing Capabilities, Host Name, Assigned Tunnel ID"; RFC 2661 Section 7.2.1 gives wait-ctl-reply the row "Receive SCCRP, not acceptable | Send StopCCN, Clean up | idle" (§6.2)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestSCCRPMissingMandatoryAVPTearsTheTunnelDown |
unit/verify | revert, verified |
| positive | TestSCCRPWithEveryMandatoryAVPEstablishes |
unit/verify | revert, verified |
RFC2661-24.10-1
Assigned Tunnel ID of 0 in SCCRQ/SCCRP is a protocol error; reject with StopCCN. RFC 2661 Section 4.4.3: "The Assigned Tunnel ID is a 2 octet non-zero unsigned integer"; RFC 2661 Section 5.3: the value 0 "MUST NOT be used as an Assigned Session ID or Assigned Tunnel ID". The id anchor below numbers no section of RFC 2661 and is frozen (§24.10)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestSCCRQWithZeroAssignedTunnelIDIsAnswered |
unit/verify | unproven |
| negative | TestParseSCCRP_Rejects |
unit/verify | unproven |
| negative | rfc2661-sccrq-tunnel-id-zero.ci |
functional/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestSCCRQWithNonZeroAssignedTunnelIDEstablishes |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestTunnelInitiatorHandshake |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | rfc2661-sccrq-tunnel-id-zero.ci |
functional/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-24.12-1
Unknown M=1 vendor AVP in a session context tears down the session with CDN, not the tunnel with StopCCN. RFC 2661 Section 4.1 states the session/tunnel split and RFC 2661 Section 4.2 states the consequence. The id anchor below numbers no section of RFC 2661 and is frozen (§24.12)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestSession_UnknownMandatoryAVP |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestSession_UnknownMandatoryAVP |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-10-1
CDN is valid in any non-idle session state; receiving CDN destroys the session. RFC 2661 Section 5.6 states session teardown by CDN and RFC 2661 Section 7.4.2 gives the state table. The id anchor below is frozen and does NOT name Section 10, which is IANA Considerations (§10)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestSession_CDN_UnknownSessionDropped |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestSession_CDN_AnyState |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestSession_CDN_EstablishedSession |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-9-1
StopCCN cascades: all sessions in a tunnel are cleared when StopCCN is received. RFC 2661 Section 5.7: an implementation "may shut down an entire tunnel and all sessions on the tunnel by sending the StopCCN". The id anchor below is frozen and does NOT name Section 9, which is Security Considerations (§9)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestStopCCNQueuesAllTeardowns |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestSession_StopCCN_CascadeSessions |
unit/verify | unproven |
RFC2661-10-2
Session ID 0 is reserved and never assigned. RFC 2661 Section 5.3: "The value of 0 for Session ID and Tunnel ID is special and MUST NOT be used as an Assigned Session ID or Assigned Tunnel ID". The id anchor below is frozen and does NOT name Section 10, which is IANA Considerations (§10)
Audit verdict: not audited: no reader has judged these tests
| Polarity | Test | Kind and tier | Proof state |
|---|---|---|---|
| negative | TestSession_SIDBoundary_Zero |
unit/verify | unproven |
| positive | TestSession_SIDBoundary_MaxUint16 |
unit/verify | unproven |
Extraction sign-off
No extraction sign-off exists for RFC 2661, so no reviewer has walked its text sentence by sentence.
Superseded
No document obsoletes RFC 2661, so its obligations are stated where they were written.